Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.
This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.
Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal | DMCA
The Mockingbird Foundation is a non-profit organization founded by Phish fans in 1996 to generate charitable proceeds from the Phish community.
And since we're entirely volunteer – with no office, salaries, or paid staff – administrative costs are less than 2% of revenues! So far, we've distributed over $2 million to support music education for children – hundreds of grants in all 50 states, with more on the way.
I'm not overly concerned with the songs they use for the big excursions. The list of songs where they really got long winded was generally pretty short in 94/95 too.. Tweezer, Bowie, Mikes, Melt, Stash, a few Paugs, DWDs and Frees, a few singular curveball crazy versions of songs like Bitch
I guess the question is more about if Phish views 92-95 or 97-04 as their golden age. The last few years seem to point towards the former, and they seem to be taking a quality over quantity approach that hasn't really been their MO since 95.
I love that every tour has more people thinking "this is the best they've sounded since.." Personally still think the 2012 improv is the freshest style since 95 and the purest distillation of early and late 90s jam styles, but this newfound nimbleness in Trey's playing has lead to an increased swagger which really helps them develop jams quickly and confidently. Something like that Tweezer-> MFMF from Ingleood makes me giddy knowing that they aren't feeling the pressure to make every Tweezer long as much as the pressure to make everything great.
Seemed like the biggest problem from 2010-2012 was that their standards for what constituted interesting improvisation might have been too high, and they'd try to pull the ripcord on something before it got less interesting to the crowd than the next song might be. Clearly their standards are different than ours as a lot of those quick > s seemed to truncate jams right as they were exiting an amorphous space between themes and beefing the process of coalescing into something new. Late 90s/00s Phish they were a little bit too trusting that things would make a turn for the better eventually. A few years of stricter quality control have made the improv very mindful. I dig.
And despite some rocky parts in the process, there isn't a better sign for this bands vitality than them revamping and refining the way that they listen and play off one another. They seem really engaged and happy compared to when I started seeing shows.